Employee Privacy on Messengers: The Problems of Using Personal Devices at Work

The privacy rights of employees are under threat from the most basic of workplace communications. Using supposedly safe, encrypted systems is putting personal information at risk, as there is no right to employee privacy on messengers once work topics appear. How can both employees and employers tackle this difficult issue?

Privacy Rights and Employees

Employees’ privacy rights vary hugely around the world. While no-one expects to hear that such rights are protected in China, some might be surprised to hear that employees have no clear right of privacy in the US. In Europe, by contract, there has been a growing interest in privacy and a rise in protections for citizens in every area of their lives.
When it comes to employee privacy, WeChat, WhatsApp, Telegram and other messaging systems have created a problem area. Employees use them for a range of casual conversations with one another, as if they were talking in person. But these apps put that conversation in writing, and an employer may have rights to the record of communications sent in and about work. WhatsApp messages have been cited in court cases, as in a decision around harassment and unfair dismissal at PNC Global Logistics. This is particularly likely to come up if decisions are made or information sent to clients over messaging services.

Balancing Privacy Interests

One of the biggest challenges when protecting employee privacy is striking a balance between this and other rights. Customers have a right to records relating to them that can run counter to an employee’s desire for privacy. A company has a duty to maintain control over its legitimate business records, and this can extend to records of electronic communications about business matters.
Balancing these interests means bringing in clear rules. That can be tricky when, as at a company like TiVo, half the devices being used are employees’ personal devices and only half are owned by the company. This blurs the boundary between the private and the corporate, when what’s needed is a clearer segregation between the two.

How Employers Can Protect Employee Privacy

To protect the privacy rights of employees using messengers, business communication has to be governed by clear rules. Companies should set out guidelines for how these apps are to be used. When messaging will take place at work, these guidelines should include what information will be monitored on work devices and in work facilities, so that employees know what will remain private and what won’t.
For the sake of protecting businesses data, messengers can be separated off from other data, using compartmentalization and mobile device management software. This should not only separate confidential employer data on messengers from the data of employees, but also clearly show employees the scope of monitoring. We have previously discussed, whether employees should use their personal devices for work in this article.

Where possible, companies shouldn’t be trying to retain data from employees’ personal phones. The easiest way to ensure this isn’t needed is to ban the use of messengers as business communication software and keep electronic coms to email. One of world’s largest banks has gone so far as to ban WhatsApp and texting on company phones, to hold back a move of business communication to messengers.
Such rules may seem inconvenient to employees, and they can close down useful communication tools, but part of their purpose is to protect employees’ rights.

How Employees Can Protect Their Own Privacy

As an employee, there are steps you can take to preserve your privacy. You may have an obligation to hand over data if it becomes the subject of litigation, and if messaging chains combine personal and business issues then both will come to light. To protect your own privacy, it’s therefore best not to put business messaging anywhere private. If you want to message clients, WeChat or WhatsApp is a bad idea if it isn’t integrated with your company’s systems.

It’s also important to be aware of the limits of privacy. Messaging can feel as casual as conversation, but it’s more likely to have legal consequences. Employers have a responsibility to make this clear, but it’s on employees to consider the consequences and act responsibly.

LeapXpert solution for employee privacy

Our jobs are part of our lives, casual conversations important to the smooth running of our jobs. Both employees and employers can take steps to minimize the blurring of the lines and to protect the privacy of workers in the 21st century. Separation it the key.

LeapXpert messaging B2C platform provides employees the tools to separate their personal messaging from the business, by using different messengers for each purpose. Personal communication can and will always stay on the personal favorite messaging app.

All business communication between the employees, their colleagues and clients will be performed on LeapXpert desktop and mobile platforms. The platform allows employees to send text, voice and file messages to client’s messengers: WhatsApp, WeChat, Telegram, Line and others.

Apply: [email protected]

Ready to Leap your business?

LeapXpert Insights?
Follow us on Linkedin

To find out what LeapXpert is doing right now, to learn about our news and plans, and to discover more information on how our FMOP can resolve your business communication problems, follow us on LinkedIn today.
Catch up on our business news and achievements, explore and follow industry articles.
Business messaging is a huge pain point for many organizations. At this point, putting the business messaging ‘cat’ back in the bag isn’t going to work. Customers demand the ability to communicate with companies using messengers. So what’s the solution? A Federated Messaging Orchestration Platform (FMOP).
Read more
Messaging apps are a preferred method of communication for clients to contact stockbrokers. However, being hit with a $5 million fine for not being able to keep client communications when using instant messaging is a hefty price to pay.
Read more
On Jan 22, 2020 Bloomberg announced that the use of Telegram for conducting a business deal was why the court was ruling in favor of Hyundai Motor Securities Co, costing Yuanta Securities Korea Co. ~USD $12.6 million. The Seoul Central District Court has ruled that conversations held via Telegram are not binding contracts.
Read more
Data ownership
Having client poaching employees is the last thing any small business owner worries about. But just one single employee managed to cause an overnight loss of 20% in business income. Believe it or not, instant messaging can be a prime cause of client poaching.
Read more
Enterprise messaging is about more than just ensuring a consistent tone and message to your customers. It means giving your employees the right tools to respond quickly to customer requests. From compliance issues and loss of configuration control to reduced security and loss of business, there are many reasons why businesses need to implement a company wide separate enterprise messaging app.
Read more
Data ownership
The privacy rights of employees are under threat from the most basic of workplace communications. Using supposedly safe, encrypted systems is putting personal information at risk, as there is no right to employee privacy on messengers once work topics appear. How can both employees and employers tackle this difficult issue?
Read more