Compliance and communications – achieving balance

Regtech and Compliance with messaging applications

When the Covid-19 pandemic changed the way businesses operate, the use of collaboration and communication tools exploded. Messaging applications particularly saw growth, as in-person meetings stopped and remote working became the norm. Bloomberg saw a 50% increase in messages as financial institutions shut; Microsoft Teams grew from 33 million users in March 2019 to 75 million in April 2020 as businesses sort ways for employees to work collaboratively. Q220 saw around 100 billion WhatsApp messages sent a day as everyone found new ways to communicate. Communication channels changed but compliance requirements for banks and financial institutions didn’t.

Pandemic and regulatory changes

With the pandemic and ensuing global lockdown, organizations required most of their employees to work remotely. PwC compiled a survey in June 2020 with 50 executives from the US Financial Services sector. The survey indicated that 95% or more of their office workers now worked from home due to the pandemic.

However, not all employees had corporately sanctioned collaboration tools like Slack or a Bloomberg access set up to use from home. As a result, personal messaging applications have become the preferred tool for communication. 

Despite this, many companies in banking circles do not allow the use of personal messengers. Strictly enforced by banks, these bans have resulted in HR impacts and in some cases regulatory fines. In October 2020 two senior Morgan Stanley executives left due to compliance breaches from the use of unauthorized communications tools.

Balance, compliance and change

The challenge for financial institutions is to find the balance between servicing their clients during extraordinary times and ensuring that they maintain surveillance of conversations for compliance and regulatory purposes.

The rapid deployment of these solutions – often as organic responses to the unexpected move to remote working – exposes them to regulatory risk. The conversations on these applications are invisible to supervisory scrutiny. This is an issue that cannot be ignored.

Essentially the requirements for regulatory compliance haven’t changed in the face of the pandemic, even if the way in which banks work has. Supervising organizations like the SEC, CFTC, ESMA and others still require the recording and storing of all vital business communications by financial institutions – including those on messaging applications.

As Julia Hoggett, Director of Market Oversight, FCA said in her “Market abuse in a time of coronavirus” speech, “We have all had to find… many new ways of working in the last few months… We will also have to navigate huge amounts of change over the coming months, depending on the path of the virus, as we work through Return of Office models that will no doubt include both hybrid ways of working and indeed, over time, potentially long-term changes to the way we all work.”

Importantly she noted, “…this also requires firms to adjust the way in which they think of the range of surveillance tools available to them.”

“It is essential in changing times that firms identify the risks associated with the new environment in which we are all operating. ” – Julia Hoggett, Director of Marketing Oversight, FCA

Balancing the way forward

The fundamentals of market abuse offences remain constant. However, the ways that risk can arise are ever-evolving. Companies must balance the realities of doing business with the real need to contain risk – even in a time of great disruption. They need to constantly evolve the way they perform their surveillance, governance and compliance tasks.

As financial institutions consider this balance, they need to decide how to monitor conversations on consumer messaging. The new normal requires flexibility, while the environment of the conversations requires scrutiny.

Financial institutions must consider:

  • What regtech is required for their business and how flexible is it to deal with remote working? How well does it deploy across a dispersed workforce working not from specific office sites but from people’s homes?
  • What communication channels will they allow; what regulatory obligations are those channels subjected to; and what technologies do they have to deploy to ensure compliance?
  • How quickly can they deploy these solutions to a dispersed workforce? How easily can this be done with legacy systems?

Solutions for the new compliance normal

LeapXpert enables financial institutions to embrace consumer messaging applications while also delivering on their regulatory obligations. Financial institutions can record and monitor these critical electronic communications, ensuring compliance. With our Federated Messaging Orchestration Platform (FMOP) employees can also use their company tools (Microsoft Teams, Slack etc) to chat with their client’s preferred messenger (WhatsApp, WeChat, LINE etc).

LeapXpert captures and archives all messages, attachments, voice notes in the employers business-critical systems. This resolves four major challenges around messaging apps:

  • Visibility of business/client communications as not hidden on personal apps
  • Data Ownership and control as chats  stored within employer’s infrastructure
  • Compliance Controls as communication  monitored and produced for supervisors, regulatory, legal, audit and compliance purposes

LeapXpert allows Financial Institutions to ensure their employees can communicate within regulatory boundaries. Not only during these pandemic times but going forward into the new normal and the normal beyond that.

Contact one of our experts to find out how your business can deploy a solution to engage with your clients securely, ensuring compliance.

Want to know more about how LeapXpert can help your financial institution, read



Ready to Leap your business?

    LeapXpert Insights?
    Follow us on Linkedin

    To find out what LeapXpert is doing right now, to learn about our news and plans, and to discover more information on how our FMOP can resolve your business communication problems, follow us on LinkedIn today.
    Catch up on our business news and achievements, explore and follow industry articles.
    Business messaging is a huge pain point for many organizations. At this point, putting the business messaging ‘cat’ back in the bag isn’t going to work. Customers demand the ability to communicate with companies using messengers. So what’s the solution? A Federated Messaging Orchestration Platform (FMOP).
    Read more
    Messaging apps are a preferred method of communication for clients to contact stockbrokers. However, being hit with a $5 million fine for not being able to keep client communications when using instant messaging is a hefty price to pay.
    Read more
    On Jan 22, 2020 Bloomberg announced that the use of Telegram for conducting a business deal was why the court was ruling in favor of Hyundai Motor Securities Co, costing Yuanta Securities Korea Co. ~USD $12.6 million. The Seoul Central District Court has ruled that conversations held via Telegram are not binding contracts.
    Read more
    Data ownership
    Having client poaching employees is the last thing any small business owner worries about. But just one single employee managed to cause an overnight loss of 20% in business income. Believe it or not, instant messaging can be a prime cause of client poaching.
    Read more
    Enterprise messaging is about more than just ensuring a consistent tone and message to your customers. It means giving your employees the right tools to respond quickly to customer requests. From compliance issues and loss of configuration control to reduced security and loss of business, there are many reasons why businesses need to implement a company wide separate enterprise messaging app.
    Read more
    Data ownership
    The privacy rights of employees are under threat from the most basic of workplace communications. Using supposedly safe, encrypted systems is putting personal information at risk, as there is no right to employee privacy on messengers once work topics appear. How can both employees and employers tackle this difficult issue?
    Read more